In mid.
Oct., the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
decided to increase the total Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) quota for 2014 to
12,449 tons, up by 13% year on year, at its annual meeting in Adelaide,
Australia. The 2014 TAC is based on an
advice from the Scientific Committee.
This certainly shows a fruitful result of strict catch managements
implemented so far. If the stock
recovery is confirmed, there could be possibility to further ease of fishing
management, and that would be a good news for a fishing industry.
In order
to assess the stock condition of SBT, it is essential to improve accuracy of
catch data submitted by tuna farming industry in
Australia. The country takes 42% or 5,151
tons out of the total quota, and majority of the catch is for farming.
SBT caught
for farming is kept alive in a net and put into farming cages. The number of fish caught and the total
weight are not counted accurately but are estimated based upon the sample catch
regime.
This
method makes stock assessment uncertain.
This sample-based estimation also causes a doubt if the fishery
management is practiced rigorously. In case of Japan , the Fisheries Agency (JFA)
has established a strict management system.
Length and weight of each SBT caught is individually measured and
weighed on board, and fishermen are obligated to record such data into their catch
reports. Further more, landing ports are
designated, and at such ports, agents of the JFA verify the SBT and the catch
reports.
Scientists
are claiming that stereo video cameras make it possible to precisely count the numbers
and weights of SBT put into the cages.
It also improves quota management for farming fishery which currently
remains opaque.
CCSBT has
been discussing on introduction of this video for a long time, and Australia
finally committed at the 2012 annual meeting to implement it from this year.
However, Australia
announced to postpone it at the annual meeting this year. Along with the change of the government, “Australia explained that the newly elected government was concerned that unautomated
stereo video monitoring would impose an excessive regulatory and financial
burden on the industry. The government had therefore decided to postpone the
implementation of stereo video monitoring until an automated solution coulld be
developed,” a disclosed report noted. Japan and New
Zealand expressed dissent against it but failed to
reverse the Australia ’s
stand.
It might not be
meaningful to discuss if this excuse by Australia is right or wrong. Rather, it draws a doubt on the stand taken
by Australia ,
disregarding the promise committed by a result of long lasted discussion.
In 2009, paying
out of the national treasury, Japan scrapped 87 long-liners in order to abide with
her commitment to reduce quotas of SBT, Bigeye in Central and Western Pacific
Ocean, and Bluefin in East Atlantic Ocean.
It certainly was heavy economic burdens on the nation, but more burdens were
imposed upon fishermen and fishery industries that had no other choice but to terminate
their fishing activities.
However, Japan
implemented what it committed with each international tuna fisheries management
organization. Being as a responsible
nation, Japanese industries also committed themselves, along with the
government, to take stifling heavy economic and social burdens.
An international
society was disappointed with the stand taken by Australia against this stereo video
monitoring issue. Australia as a responsible fisheries
management nation, should implement her commitment to regain the international
trusts without any delay.
(This is a translation from Minato
Fisheries Daily of Japan)
No comments:
Post a Comment